Modern Wisdom

The Best Of Modern Wisdom With Chris Williamson, According to PodLand SuperNova

Chris Williamson and Brad Wilcox

Chris sits down with Brad Wilcox who is a Professor of Sociology at the University of Virginia and Director of the National Marriage Project. They discuss why some people naturally happier than others? Whether it's genetics, upbringing, or life circumstances, how can one finally rediscover joy and feel like your true self again? They discuss why young liberal women are so unhappy and why in contrast, conservative women are happier. Another topic covered in detailed is whether or not finding your one true soulmate is actually a myth and if people should have a more realistic expectation. Also, covered is the fall of boys and rise of girls and how boys can get back on track.


The Soulmate Myth and "Eat Pray Love"


Wilcox begins by critiquing Liz Gilbert’s Eat Pray Love, arguing it promotes a "soulmate myth" where relationships are based on finding a perfect emotional connection that will complete us and provide endless fulfillment. He notes the book’s appeal, especially among women, with its storybook romance in Bali, where Gilbert meets a seemingly perfect man who is feminist, a great cook, and lover. However, as is often the case, fiction is…fiction. Wilcox points out that Gilbert’s real-life relationships have been extremely unstable, as she left the man in the book after10 years for another soulmate, and later pivoted to a woman for five years (who passed away), dated the woman’s best friend, and recently announced at age 55 she is happily single. This, he argues, exemplifies the pitfalls of basing love solely on feelings. Sounds strange (maybe to some)- but maybe we’ve all been lying to ourselves about these Hollywood romances. He advocates a more grounded approach, suggesting that prioritizing commitment over emotional highs could lead to more stable relationships, and society.


Building a Foundation for a Happy Marriage


Wilcox advocates for shifting the foundation of marriage from feelings to a commitment to the good of the other and a family-first approach. Drawing on St. Thomas Aquinas, he describes love as "pursuing the good of the other," emphasizing that marriage should focus on the spouse’s and family’s well-being rather than seeking personal happiness (maybe some balance here would be in order). This family-first perspective, he argues, provides stability by emphasizing solidarity, financial foundations, and the needs of children. He notes that when conflicts arise or romance fades, couples with this approach are less likely to falter because they recognize marriage involves multiple dimensions, such as financial stability and child-rearing, beyond just emotional connection. This contrasts with the "Liz Gilbert approach," which he sees as putting relationships on shaky ground, especially given the high divorce rates associated with “feeling-based” marriages. It’s easy to disagree with the absolutes in these premises, but there is no doubt that commitment beyond whims will drive longevity more than just “feelings”. Still some need to hear it.


Happiness Studies: Conservatives vs. Liberals


A significant focus is on research showing conservative women, particularly aged 18-40, report higher happiness. Wilcox cites the 2024 American Family Survey, revealing 37% of conservative women are "completely satisfied" with their lives, compared to 12% of liberal women and 28% of moderates. This "happiness gap" is attributed to conservatives being more likely to be married (55% vs. 35% for liberals) and to attend religious services regularly, which fosters community ties. Wilcox argues this contrasts with liberals’ focus on individualism and progressive values, which may lead to loneliness (29% of liberal women report loneliness multiple times a week vs. 11% for conservatives). He notes this gap extends to men, with conservatives aged 18-55 being 60% more likely to be "very happy," partly due to marriage and faith, as supported by studies like those from the Institute for Family Studies.


The Importance of Marriage and Family


Wilcox emphasizes marriage and family as crucial for happiness, noting conservatives are more likely to be happily married, contributing to their life satisfaction. He highlights data showing children from intact, married households are more likely to graduate college and less likely to end up in prison, with a striking statistic that boys raised outside intact families are more likely to land in jail than graduate college. Wilcox argues that a commitment to marriage as a lifelong partnership, prioritizing family needs, benefits both adults and children, with research showing married men earn 26% more than their unmarried identical twins. We’ve seen a lot of this information before in other places. One key point is…these men NEED to make more money to support the family, so there’s a bit more to read into these statistics, perhaps, than Wilcox explains.


The Impact of Technology on Relationships


Wilcox expresses concern about technology’s impact, noting AI and social media may reduce face-to-face interactions, potentially leading to fewer marriages and lower birth rates. We’ve been seeing this since online dating began, really. He observes that people are spending more time on screens, which could hinder socializing, dating, and family formation; you don’t have to look far to see the global decline in fertility rates. He argues that all this screen-time will have long-term societal implications, such as weaker community ties and increased loneliness. There is nothing really to disagree with here.


Mimetic Nature of Marriage and Family Life


Wilcox introduces the concept of mimetic behavior, explaining marriage, divorce, and family formation are contagious within social networks. Research, such as Nicholas Christakis’s work at Yale, shows if your friends or family get married or divorced, you’re more likely to follow suit. This is yet another classic example of how friends and people you surround yourself with can impact you decisions - definitely interesting, however, when thinking about it from a family planning perspective.


Gender Dynamics in Education and the Workforce


Chris and Wilcox discuss how boys and men are falling behind in education. Wilcox notes that girls outperform boys from primary school through higher education. It’s projected that two women will complete a full-year US college degree for every man by 2030. This trend, he argues, contributes to men’s struggles in the workforce, where women are increasingly out-earning them in certain age groups, among college-educated workers. The proportion of young men not in college, employed, or in vocational training has increased by 40% since the pandemic, compared to 7% for women. So, he calls for primary educational reforms, such as more recess and engaging curricula, to support boys, recognizing this imbalance affects relationship prospects, as women often seek equally or more successful partners.


The Role of Men in Society


Wilcox discusses the need for a positive vision of masculinity, noting women still value men as providers and protectors, even in modern relationships. Research shows women in marriages where husbands are better providers and protective are happier. However, Wilcox also emphasizes men need to be attentive and involved, balancing traditional roles with modern expectations, such as emotional and practical support in family life. Basically, men need to be more rounded and hold on to provider and protector roles while being more involved in the home and kids and empathetic orientation women are looking for. This isn’t going to be done by villifying boys though, we need some new ideas on how to speak to boys or we are just going to end up with a bunch of unmarried, aggrieved kids. The current education system and woke approach is doing these boys a grave disservice, it seems.


Stay-at-Home Dads: A Viable Option?


The conversation explores whether stay-at-home dads are feasible, with Wilcox noting some families succeed, but data shows it’s less common in stable, upper-middle-class households. Women report lower marital satisfaction when husbands are stay-at-home dads, and divorce risk increases 33% when men lose jobs, compared to no effect when women do. Wilcox suggests this reflects persistent associations of breadwinning with masculinity, with female breadwinner households more common in working-class and poor communities. Again, the modern situation for men is…complex.


Political Implications of Cultural Shifts


Wilcox connects cultural and economic trends to politics, noting young men, feeling disenfranchised, are drawn to conservative or anti-feminist ideologies, as seen in recent elections. For example, Trump gained 56% of young men’s votes compared to 58% for Harris, with black and Latino men also supporting him, reflecting dissatisfaction with economic and educational trends. Wilcox suggests this shift, like to South Korea’s recent election where young men turned right, shows men gravitating toward leaders offering macho, male-focused messages. The key is to point them away from the Andrew Tate’s while enabling to restore some dignity.


PodLand’s Take


Wilcox challenges the romanticized "soulmate myth"which prioritizes fleeting emotional highs over the deeper commitment needed for lasting partnerships. Instead, it advocates for a family-first approach, emphasizing mutual well-being and dedication as the true bedrock of marriage. He believes (and some research indicates) marriage and family could be more valuable for happiness and stability. This is no doubt true, but we think that evolving gender roles, media driven expectations, and a cultural move to narcissistic behavior all further complicate the issue. Somewhere missing in Wilcox’s POV and the “soulmate myth” is a balance not easily found.

Chris Williamson and Tom Segura

Chris sits with Brigham Buhler, a healthcare entrepreneur and CEO of Ways2Well, shares eye-opening insights into the American healthcare crisis. He discusses how profit-driven motives lead to exorbitant costs and rampant prescription drug reliance. Buhler reveals the shocking truth behind America's highest bankruptcy rates linked to medical bills. He also critiques the roles of big pharma and emphasizes lifestyle changes over medications in mental health. The discussion weaves together key themes—systemic failures in American healthcare, the overreliance on pharmaceuticals, the power of preventative care, and the challenges of navigating a profit-driven system—each unpacked with detailed stories and real-world examples that make the abstract tangible.


Systemic Failures in American Healthcare:


A central theme of the podcast is the deep-rooted dysfunction within the American healthcare system, which Buhler describes as a labyrinth of inefficiency and profit-first priorities. He recounts his early disillusionment when, as a young sales rep working for a medical device company, he discovered that hospitals were more focused on securing reimbursements than improving patient outcomes. For example, he shares a story about pitching a device to a hospital board, only to be met with questions like, “How much will Medicare pay us for this?” rather than “How will this help our patients?” This anecdote underscores his broader point: the system incentivizes procedures and treatments over genuine care. Williamson and Buhler also discuss how primary care physicians are overworked and underpaid, with Buhler noting that a doctor might see 30 patients a day, leaving little time for meaningful interaction. He claims that most doctors he knows are “beat down” and want

”out” in three to five years. This leads to a “band-aid” approach, where symptoms are treated without addressing root causes.. In a nutshell, profits trump outcomes and the conglomerates have integrated insurance, medical practice and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMS) further narrowing care and maximizing profit cuts.


Overreliance on Pharmaceuticals:


Another major theme is the pervasive overreliance on prescription drugs, which Buhler critiques as a symptom of a healthcare model that prioritizes quick fixes over long-term solutions. He shares a vivid anecdote about a patient he encountered early in his career—a middle-aged man on 12 medications, each prescribed to counteract the side effects of the last. “It was like watching a house of cards collapse,” Buhler says, explaining how this man’s doctor never considered lifestyle changes or root causes, just more pills. Williamson chimes in with his own observations about the cultural acceptance of medication in the U.S., contrasting it with other countries where diet and exercise are first-line interventions. Buhler ties this to the influence of pharmaceutical companies, recounting how, during his time in the industry, he saw sales reps push drugs like statins with aggressive marketing, even when evidence for their universal efficacy was shaky. The conversation highlights a vicious cycle: patients expect pills, doctors are pressed for time, and drug companies profit, all while health outcomes stagnate or worsen.


“The system isn’t built to heal people—it’s built to bill people. I saw it firsthand when they cared more about Medicare codes than the patient in the bed.” – Brigham Buhler


The Power of Preventative Care:


In contrast to the reactive nature of mainstream healthcare, Buhler passionately advocates for preventative care as a game-changer. He shares a personal story about his own health journey, describing how years of neglecting sleep and nutrition left him burned out and reliant on caffeine—until he overhauled his lifestyle with bloodwork-guided interventions through Ways2Well. “I went from feeling like a zombie to running circles around my old self,” he says, emphasizing how simple changes like optimizing vitamin D levels or cutting processed foods can transform wellbeing. Williamson probes further, asking how accessible this approach is, and Buhler admits it’s an uphill battle against a system that doesn’t reimburse prevention. He tells of a patient, a truck driver, who reversed his pre-diabetes with diet tweaks after years of being offered metformin by his doctor—a success story that fuels Buhler’s mission. One of Buhler’s key claims is that individuals can reclaim their health, but it requires stepping outside the conventional medical treadmill.


Navigating a Profit-Driven System:


Finally, the duo explore the challenges of navigating a healthcare system driven by profit rather than patient welfare, a reality Buhler has grappled with firsthand. He recounts a striking moment from his career when he realized insurance companies dictate care more than doctors do, recalling a case where a patient’s life-saving treatment was denied because it wasn’t “in-network.” “It’s soul-crushing to see someone suffer because of a spreadsheet,” he says, his voice heavy with frustration. Williamson ties this to broader societal distrust in institutions, asking how patients can fight back. Buhler suggests becoming an informed advocate, sharing how he once helped a friend negotiate a hospital bill down from $20,000 to $2,000 simply by challenging the charges—a David-vs-Goliath anecdote that illustrates the power of persistence. In summary, we know the system is rigged, but knowledge and tenacity can level the playing field, if only slightly.


CONCLUSION:


This episode hit like a freight train. Buhler’s energy and Williamson interest in the subject are apparent. They don’t just diagnose the problem; they challenge listeners to rethink their relationship with health, blending critique with actionable insights. It’s a call to wake up to the flaws around us and take ownership of what we can control, delivered with the raw honesty of someone who’s seen the machine from the inside.


THE PODSCORE: 4.5 (of 5) MICS

Chris Williamson and Tom Segura

Chris chats with Tom Segura, a comedian and insightful podcaster, dives into the absurdities of modern life. He discusses the quirks of Gen Z, like their preference for Ozempic over traditional gym workouts and their shift from alcohol to alternatives like microdosing. Tom explores social media's role in shaping perceptions, the complexities of friendships today, and even shares his obsession with true crime documentaries. With his signature humor, he reflects on the impact of economic disparities and the psychological nuances behind self-criticism and personal growth.


REVIEW:


While we have always had a luke-warm opinion of Tom Segura (fine comedian but haven’t gone out of our way to watch / listen to him), he manages to bring some levity to a show that can occasionally get lost in platitudes. The episode begins with a pretty accurate and funny take on body positivity and Ozempic. Summary - all of all Hollywood is on GLP1’s and don’t admit it and GLP1’s are now everywhere in the general population a well, for people that can afford it. Yet, in many cases two-thirds of weight loss for many people is lean muscle mass. So, as a society, we now have a short cut for weight loss, and interestingly it puts an end to the absurdly hypocritical body-positive movement because…well, if fat is so positive, why are we paying for Ozempic?


“I hate the fat positivity movement…They are such hypocrites! They are such Pieces of Shit!” - Tom Segura


There was an interesting bit where they discussed the fact that you can now reset your algorithm on Instagram. Instagram just released this features a couple of month ago. It’s pretty wild, you can start over with Instagram and experience a whole fresh new, uncurated world. It’s something that deserves a look. From there they spend a fair bit of time discussing the change in recreational behavior among Gen Z. There is more and more evidence that kids are drinking less (they mention only 20% of Gen Z or younger drink alcohol regularly) and are having less sex, and are more lonely. This sounds like a pretty bleak outlook for these kids, but the drinking isn’t quite as low as these guys portray. A quick Google search and we found that approximately 60% of Gen Z drink but only 25% drink four or more times a week …still plenty of booze flowing. Chris and Tom speculate that kids are eating more marijuana or doing other drugs. Anyway, they worry about the social lives of younger generations and particularly boys, who seemingly have no idea how to talk to girls anymore. They kept it light but geeeeeeeze…Downer all around.


They go on to discuss USAID’s plan to send $50 million dollars of condoms to Gaza (um, what?), communicating better, the world annihilation clock, Tom’s friend who had cancer and more, but what struck us was a thread through the last hour about how to maximize performance. The thread was interesting in that they moved from blocking out negative self talk to the benefit of proclivity for action and benefits of “manufactured” stupidity. In summary, rumination and fear of fear are obstacles to be overcome and can be overcome with…action. Good listen - light and useful.


The Pod Score 3.5 (of 5) Mics.

Chris Williamson and Alain de Botton

Chris interviews Alain de Botton, philosopher and founder of The School of Life, shares profound insights on healing and emotional growth. He discusses the origins of negative inner voices and why we often struggle with emotional connections. De Botton emphasizes the impact of childhood experiences on adult relationships, and the importance of balancing intellectual understanding with genuine emotional engagement. He offers strategies for navigating love and fear in relationships, and the transformative power of therapy for personal development.


The Good:  In a thought-provoking inside the human mind, Alain and Williamson take the viewer on a tour of the inner thoughts we all have.  They start off and spend considerable time discecting our innver voices.  Specifically, they focus on how to manage that negative inner voice.  These inner-voices (positive or negative) often originate from external influences and experiences.  What is fascinating is that Alain makes the point that this external syntax and framework is very, very difficult to change, particularly as it emerges in relationships and behavior into adulthood.  In fact, he makes the point that it's akin to learning a foreign language as an adult.  


The good news is ...we can be aware of these syntax and frameworks.  The conversation continues to focus on meditation and therapy as solutions to these issues - perhaps with greater focus on therapy.  They also warn of the dangers of dissociating from emotions, particularly from overwhelming floods of different emotions.  That is where recognizing emotions and trying to isolate and acknowledge them can move one toward clarity.  Alain begins the conclusion of the episode saying that at our time of death, we won't know ourselves nearly as much as we think we do, but yet many of us will at least try.  


The Bad:  Look, you have to be open to learning more about a topic like this and if you are in the mood for political red-meat or a dopamine pulse, maybe you are in the wrong place...or maybe the right one, actually. In thinking about what might have been "bad" about this episode, the only thing this reviewer can identify is that it left you craving a bit more - maybe a bit more in terms of philosophy or psychology or religion.  And that is not really a bad thing at all.  


THE POD SCORE:  4.5 Mics (of 5)


"The mood of modern Instagram...is pure pathology!"

Chris Williamson and Piers Morgan

Chris interviews Piers Morgan, a prominent journalist and author known for his candid interviews, discusses the current state of American politics and cultural debates. He examines Biden’s decision to pardon his son and its implications. Piers shares insights on cancel culture and whether 'wokeism' is fading. He reflects on his interview with Trump, the failures of political promises, and the need for constructive dialogue. Additionally, he critiques the evolution of masculinity and the impact of social media on political identity.


The Good:  It's always interesting to hear Piers as the guest.  He's, of course, well spoken, articulate and well-informed.  What was really interesting was his first-hand accounts of phone calls he's had with Donald Trump in which he identifies some vulnerability in him after the shooting and more.  Piers pours dirt on the concept of wokism declaring it "dead" and he does so convincingly - also the end of virtue signaling.  There is a return to the center across both parties - or at least some pundits.  He claims that if you look at Trump's first term he was actually quite moderate.  


It's also interesting to hear Morgan's take on the collapse of legacy media vs. Youtube.  He describes how he simply canceled his linear TV show in favor of focusing on Youtube.
"Young people don't watch TV."  Also, there was interesting insight into how the Tories and and Reform parties may merge and promote Farage.  


The Bad:  Great conversation, but at only an hour, a bit too short for a great podcast grade.  Also, if you've heard much Piers, this was a bit of a recap of his known beliefs.  For example, his (valid) example of the black square he didn't post on instagram during the George Floyd protests.  A great story, but  one some of us have heard.   Lastly, Piers had a tendency to speak over Chris...which is kind of off brand for this podcast. .


THE POD SCORE:  4 Mics (of 5)


"It's A Weird Time Where Losing Is More Celebrated Than Winning.  This is Ruinous."



Chris Williamson and Rangan Chatterjee

Tony Robbins, renowned life and business coach and #1 bestselling author, dives deep into what it truly means to live a fulfilling life. He discusses the power of self-esteem and the importance of deriving validation from meaningful contributions. Robbins shares strategies for balancing ambition with gratitude, emphasizes the role of anticipation in achieving goals, and underscores the transformative impact of mindset on personal growth. Hear insights on letting go of the past, navigating conflict, and the journey towards providing 100 billion meals.


The Good:  So, we took this review on with an open mind.  This reviewer spent a life-time avoiding Tony Robbins and outside of a few clips on YouTube, has never really seen / listened to him.  So, if you are a Tony Robbins super-fan take this review with a grain of salt.  If you are a Tony Robbins hater, I'd say open your mind for a minute.  It's easy to get Tony Robbins right away, he's a positive dude that inspires self-responsibility and purpose and then has a million frameworks to preframe, frame, reframe the world and to take action in fixing your life.  None of what he said didn't make sense.  And...because the podcast was less than two hours, we were able to stick with it.


The Bad:  Self-help is, no doubt, an acquired taste and Tony is the king of that jungle.  So, if you have an aversion to that sort of thing, then maybe this isn't for you.  But given that many thousands of people pay many thousands of dollars to attend his four day events then 2 hours with a solid like interviewer like Williams might be worth it.  Give it a shot.


THE POD SCORE:  3 Mics (of 5)


"The Majority of People Focus on That (What They Don't Have)"

Chris Williamson and Rangan Chatterjee

Dr. Rangan Chatterjee, a physician and holistic health advocate, dives into the science of behavior change. He discusses the dangers of perfectionism and the societal pressures of hero worship, urging listeners to embrace imperfection. Rangan emphasizes the importance of self-awareness, reflecting on past choices to foster growth. He challenges rigid non-negotiables in daily routines, promoting flexibility instead. Additionally, he highlights the need for balance between ambition and personal relationships, advocating for emotional resilience in navigating life's criticisms.

 

"The Biggest Disease in Society Today is the Disease of More!"  


The Good:  Wide ranging discussion on a number of topics related to physical and mental health, with a real focuse on mental health's impact on the body.  Reframing, grounding, breathing are all heavily featured.


The Bad: Dr. Chatterjee doesn't cover a whole lot of new ground but has a very elegant clear way of presenting common sense recommendations on how to combat perfectionism and focus on "enough".


THE POD SCORE:  3.5 Mics (of 5)

Chris Williamson and Konstantin Kisin

Konstantin Kisin, a podcaster and political commentator, shares his insights on the current socio-political landscape with Chris Williamson. He dives into the implications of Trump’s victory for the West and discusses whether he's genuinely right-wing. The conversation touches on the evolving role of media and the impact of social platforms on political discourse. Kisin emphasizes the socio-economic divide in Britain and the global implications of governmental policies. Lastly, he reflects on the transformative nature of parenthood amidst cultural clashes between the US and UK.


"Close the Border and Destroy All This Woke Crap...to Bring on a Renaissance..."


The Good:  Konstantin is thoughtful and has a grasp of US and UK politics.  His own podcast, TRIGGERNOMETRY. often contains wonkey discussions of current issues and he brings that to Chris Williamson.  Decent, if not covered takes on the "podcast election" Trumps potential, troubles in the UK, social media and being a dad.


The Bad:  Konstantin himself is a detailed presenter and compotent guest, differs little from a typical political commentator.  Chris dldn't pull much more out of him than that in this episode.  


THE POD SCORE:  3.5 Mics (of 5)

Modern Wisdom With Chris Williamson and David Senra

David Senra, host of Founders Podcast and an investor, dives into the lessons from history's greatest leaders. He explores how the capacity to manage pain is central to excellence. The power of supportive relationships is highlighted, showcasing mentorship's role in entrepreneurship. Senra also discusses the tension between parental expectations and personal passions. He emphasizes prioritizing happiness over societal success, the importance of silence in business, and the paradox of self-belief impacting achievement.


"Revenge is So Interesting" and a Major Motivator.